Web Accessibility (WCAG) Guide for SaaS Websites

What WCAG compliance actually requires, why it matters beyond legal risk, and a practical checklist to audit your own site.

Date: March 14, 2024
4 min read
WCAG web accessibility guide diagram

TL;DR: Web accessibility means designing so people with visual, motor, auditory, or cognitive disabilities can actually use your product - not a legal checkbox, though it does reduce legal risk too. WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) is the standard most compliance requirements reference. This guide covers what it actually requires, why it matters beyond risk avoidance, and a practical checklist to audit your own site.

What Is WCAG?

WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) is the internationally recognized standard for web accessibility, published by the W3C, defining specific criteria for making web content usable by people with disabilities. WCAG is organized into three conformance levels - A (minimum), AA (the level most legal requirements and business standards target), and AAA (the most stringent, rarely required in full). Most SaaS companies should target WCAG 2.1 or 2.2 Level AA as their compliance benchmark.

You can read the full standard directly at the W3C's WCAG documentation, which is the authoritative source these guidelines are drawn from.

Why Accessibility Matters

Accessibility matters for three overlapping reasons: it's the right thing to do for the roughly 15-20% of people globally who live with some form of disability, it reduces legal risk (accessibility lawsuits against websites have grown substantially in recent years), and it frequently improves the product for everyone - captions help users in noisy environments, good color contrast helps users in bright sunlight, clear focus states help keyboard power users. Accessible design and good design overlap far more than most teams assume going in.

The Four POUR Principles

WCAG is built around four core principles, often abbreviated POUR:

  • Perceivable - information must be presentable in ways all users can perceive (alt text for images, captions for video, sufficient color contrast).
  • Operable - interface components must be operable by all users (keyboard-navigable, no content that requires precise timing or fine motor control users can't achieve).
  • Understandable - information and UI operation must be understandable (clear labels, consistent navigation, predictable behavior).
  • Robust - content must work reliably across assistive technologies (screen readers, voice control) and be built on valid, well-structured code.

A Practical Accessibility Checklist

  1. Color contrast - text meets WCAG AA contrast ratios (4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text) against its background.
  2. Keyboard navigation - every interactive element can be reached and operated using only a keyboard, with visible focus states.
  3. Alt text - all meaningful images have descriptive alt text; decorative images are marked as such.
  4. Form labels - every form field has a properly associated label, not just placeholder text.
  5. Heading structure - pages use a logical heading hierarchy (H1, H2, H3) rather than skipping levels or using headings for visual styling alone.
  6. Semantic HTML - buttons are actual button elements, links are actual link elements, not styled divs with click handlers.
  7. Video captions - captions or transcripts for any video content with audio.

Common Accessibility Violations

  • Low-contrast text - light gray text on white backgrounds that's stylish but fails contrast requirements.
  • Icon-only buttons with no label - a trash can icon with no accessible name for screen reader users.
  • Missing focus states - custom-styled interfaces that remove the browser's default focus outline without replacing it.
  • Non-descriptive link text - multiple "Click here" links on a page with no context for screen reader users navigating by link list.
  • Auto-playing content - video or audio that plays automatically with no easy way to pause it.

How to Audit Your Own Site

Start with automated tools (like axe DevTools or Lighthouse's accessibility audit) to catch the most common structural issues quickly, then do a manual pass: navigate your core flows using only a keyboard, and test with a screen reader (VoiceOver on Mac, NVDA on Windows) to experience the site the way many disabled users actually do. Automated tools catch roughly a third of real accessibility issues - manual testing is necessary to catch the rest, particularly around logical flow and clarity.

Accessibility and Design Quality

Building accessibility in from the start is significantly cheaper than retrofitting it later, the same way any foundational design decision is cheaper to get right early than to unwind after launch. In Elysium's process, accessibility checks are part of the design review, not a separate audit bolted on before launch - which is both faster and produces better outcomes than treating it as a compliance step at the end.

Conclusion

Web accessibility is about making your product genuinely usable for the full range of people trying to use it, with legal risk reduction and cross-user usability improvements as real side benefits. Target WCAG 2.1/2.2 Level AA, build it in from the design phase, and audit with both automated tools and manual testing.

If you want an accessibility review of your current product, book a call with Elysium Designs.

elysiumdesigns.in/intro

Radhika, Elysium Designs
WRITTEN BY
Radhika
What to read next?
UX Research Methods: A Practical Guide for Product Teams
FAQ’s

Straight Answers

CTA Author Image
Shiva Bajpai
Founder & CEO, Elysium
Serving clients worldwide

Ready to collaborate? Tell us what you’re building, we’ll take it from there.